Covid-19 Cepiva

ABC News Affiliate Accidentally Discovers the Truth About COVID Vaccines | The Gateway Pundit | by Larry Johnson

The World Tribune has a stunning story about an ABC News reporter’s effort to target the unvaccinated and support the Biden policy to force vaccines.

www.thegatewaypundit.com

The World Tribune has a stunning story about an ABC News reporter’s effort to target the unvaccinated and support the Biden policy to force vaccines. WXYZ in Detriot, an ABC affiliate, asked viewers to share stories of loved ones who died of COVID after refusing or delaying to get the vaccine. This request produced an unexpected truth bomb.

By noon on Monday, the post had received over 39,000 angry and often heartbreaking responses. Virtually every string contains a firsthand report by people whose family members are grieving the loss of loved ones of all ages.
Typical of many of the responses, one woman wrote poignantly:

Klikni za razširitev

Klikni za razširitev

Uporabnik johan_blond je napisal:

Osnova debate je da nakladš brez osnov.
a) profesor (ki je bil tudi na EMA-i) poda nekajh trditev in ocen
b) ekspert Utisevalec ga hladnokrvno zavrne s trditvijo da laže (mirno bi lahko rekel, da se z njegovimi trditvami ne strinjaš in podal nasprotno mnenje)
c) začnemo z analizami, kaj je rekel ekspert Utisevalec in vidimo da iz stavka v stavek nakladaš

Trdil si da "prilagoditev na alfa in beta sev J&J, pa še to ga ima ker je prišlo na trg kot novo že s temi prilagoditvami ker je "zamujalo""

Dejstvo je, da nima nobene prilagoditve na alfa in beta sev (prilagoditev je, da pogledaš zaporednje S proteina in potem v vektorju prilagodiš zapis tej sekvenci) . Prilagoditve enostavno ni. Dejansko je prišlo na tržišče kasneje, ker je bil razvoj daljši, ne pa ker bi kasneje začeli za razvojem (in naredili to famozno "prilagoditev"). Da ne bo nesporazumov in izmikanja, trditev je bila jasno postavljena, da ima prilagoditev, ker je bilo kasneje uvedeno na tržišče.

Štrukelj izjavi: "vidimo, da je v bolnišnicah 90 odstotkov ljudi necepljenih", ti pa rečeš da je lažnivec, ker se bo mogoče čez 3 tedne izkazalo da delež cepljenih v bolnišnici danes ni 90 %, s tem da ni nikoli trdil da je danes 90 % hospitaliziranih necepljenih. Podal je, oceno ki je trenutno ustrezna.
Če bi že hotel, bi lahko rekel, da je ta podatek o 90 % že zastarel in da je že danes odstoek nižji.
Potem pa imamo sledeči problem, da tudi to če je hopsitaliziranih samo 85 % necepljenih, to ne spremeni njeove trditve in osnovne ideje, ki pa je " da nas cepivo varuje pred resnim potekom bolezni.".
Sam se sklicuješ na nek detalj, da nekoga definira za lažnjivca, sam pa druge obtožuješ, da se vtikajo v nepomebne detalje.

Identično velja za tvojo trditev, kaj spremeni dejstvo ali bo januarja Pfizer v2 na tržišču ali ne. Če januarja ne bo v2 na tržišču je Štukelj lažnjivec.
Izjavil je "Protokol je razmeroma hiter in zelo natančen. Narediti morajo kakovostno študijo treh zaporednih serij in manjšo klinično študijo, v kateri se bo pokazalo, da ta sprememba ne vpliva na varnost in poveča učinkovitost. Če bo vse po sreči, pričakujemo, da bodo ta cepiva na voljo januarja."

Navedal je da je s mRNA tehnologija zelo enostavno narediit modificirano cepivo, ki proizvajalo v telesu, S-preotin, ki bo vključevalo mutacijo v virusnem S-proteinu iz novih sevov (kar je povsem res, ni nekega razvoja in študij). Pove jasno da je tukaj vključen proces izdelave cepiva, "kakovostno študijo treh zaporednih serij", jasno je povedano da mora slediit evalvacija in odobritev (če de dela klinično študijo, se jo dela za regulatoja, na kar proizvajalec nima vpliva). In jasno pove, da bomo lahko veseli, če bo to januarja.
No in tukaj se Utisevalec postavi v pozicijo, če ni Pfizerja v2 januarja na policij je Štrukelj lažnivec in Utisevalec obvlada.

Jasno je samo, da če preberešnekaj zadnjih zapisov Utisevalec-a o cepivih, da Utisevalec nima pojma o dejstvih in da svoje neznanje kompenzira s nakladanjem.

Klikni za razširitev

The Smoking Syringe: Was evidence withheld from ACIP when they recommended the Pfizer-Vaccine?

Opinion Editorial by: David Wiseman Ph.D., M.R.Pharm.S. Summary

trialsitenews.com

• In approving this recommendation, ACIP heard evidence from Pfizer, Kaiser Permanente, CDC, and other scientists on the safety and effectiveness of the vaccine.
• Apparently fully or partially absent from this evidence were six studies, cited in a post-vote presentation. These studies, including those by CDC and Pfizer scientists, describe waning vaccine effectiveness, or effectiveness against the delta strain, from the 90-95% range to, in one case to as low as 42%.
• The inclusion of these missing studies would have yielded a different risk-benefit analysis.
• Given the ramifications this recommendation is already having on vaccine mandate policy, the evidence presented to ACIP does not appear to meet the highest level of standards for scientific integrity and conduct.
• Other intense safety signals, such as a 177 times increase in the number of deaths per vaccinated person reported for Covid-19 vaccines, compared with flu vaccines, were not considered.
• ACIP did not consider the possible effects of the vaccines on pregnancy or the reproductive system, hinted at by the announcement the same day by NIH, to fund studies on the links between the Covid-19 vaccines and menstrual disorders.
• ACIP did not consider other possible long-term effects (cancer, autoimmune disease) of the vaccines related to their falling under the FDA classification of a “gene therapy product,” and made no comment about the lack of studies performed by Pfizer/BioNTech “for the potential to cause carcinogenicity, genotoxicity, or impairment of male fertility.”
• The significant short and potentially long-term cardiac, vascular, hematological, musculoskeletal, intestinal, respiratory or neurologic symptoms health issues stemming from the use of these vaccines pose a major and expensive public health problem.To concretize recognition of, and to spur action to avert and confront this potential public health crisis, we have proposed the term:

Post Covid Vaccine Syndrome – pCoVS

• There needs to be:
  • Assignment of ICD10 and related tracking or reimbursement codes for pCoVS.
  • Funding for research and tracking for long-term and delayed pCoVS.
  • Regulation of the Pfizer, Moderna, and Janssen vaccines as Gene Therapy products, requiring long-term follow-up.
• Since FDA and CDC cannot assure us about the safety of two vaccine doses, how can they give any assurance about a third (or more doses)?

Klikni za razširitev

The tangled history of mRNA vaccines

Hundreds of scientists had worked on mRNA vaccines for decades before the coronavirus pandemic brought a breakthrough.

www.nature.com

In late 1987, Robert Malone performed a landmark experiment. He mixed strands of messenger RNA with droplets of fat, to create a kind of molecular stew. Human cells bathed in this genetic gumbo absorbed the mRNA, and began producing proteins from it1.

Realizing that this discovery might have far-reaching potential in medicine, Malone, a graduate student at the Salk Institute for Biological Studies in La Jolla, California, later jotted down some notes, which he signed and dated. If cells could create proteins from mRNA delivered into them, he wrote on 11 January 1988, it might be possible to “treat RNA as a drug”. Another member of the Salk lab signed the notes, too, for posterity. Later that year, Malone’s experiments showed that frog embryos absorbed such mRNA2. It was the first time anyone had used fatty droplets to ease mRNA’s passage into a living organism.

Klikni za razširitev

Major ICMR Study of Indian Healthcare Workers Reveals COVID-19 Vaccine Antibodies Wane within 2 Months for Covaxin & 3 Months for Covishield (AstraZeneca)

In what could be considered problematic implications for COVID-19 vaccination in India, a recent study involving 614 Indian health workers found a "significant" drop in the study participant’s COVID-19-fighting antibodies within a couple of months of the second dose in the case of the COVID-19...

trialsitenews.com

Major ICMR Study of Indian Healthcare Workers Reveals COVID-19 Vaccine Antibodies Wane within 2 Months for Covaxin & 3 Months for Covishield (AstraZeneca)​

Klikni za razširitev

Data shows Covid booster shots are 'not appropriate' at this time, U.S. and international scientists conclude

An expert review of data concludes Covid vaccine boosters are not needed at this time for the general public, a group of U.S. and international scientists said.

www.cnbc.com

KEY POINTS

• An expert review of scientific evidence has concluded that Covid vaccine booster shots are not needed at this time for the general public, a group of leading U.S. and international scientists said Monday.
• The conclusion in the peer-reviewed journal The Lancet comes a week before the Biden administration says it plans to begin offering the shots to the general public.
• An FDA advisory group is meeting Friday to discuss the data to support the wide use of boosters.

Klikni za razširitev