As reflected in the WHO’s concerns, sound science strongly suggests that the more you vaccinate, the more likely you will spawn vaccine-resistant mutations. Therefore, the more likely those who have been vaccinated will fall prey to the mutations. To put this another way, minimizing the number of people vaccinated is the BEST way to protect the most vulnerable – and most efficiently allocate scarce vaccine supplies around the world.
We must be honest here – because the Biden regime has not been. Each of the major vaccines can cause a wide range of serious side effects – or kill people outright. Yet, the FDA’s system to monitor such “adverse events” appears to undercount such events dramatically.
In contrast, the European Union’s far more accurate system yields alarming statistics: As of July 31, 2021, the Eudravigilance10 database has recorded 20,525 deaths and 1,960,607 injuries.
We reiterate we are not anti-vaxers. One (Malone) has been mentioned as a candidate for the Nobel Prize for his pioneering work on mRNA vaccines. The other played a key role in jumpstarting operation WARP speed.
We found that sera from Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine remain high reactivity toward the receptor binding domain (RBD) of Delta variant while it drops dramatically toward that of Lambda variant.
Who is considered to be vaccinated / recovered and protected?
- A person who was vaccinated with two vaccine doses, within 6 months from the date of the second vaccination
- A person who was vaccinated with three vaccine doses, a week after the third vaccination
- A person who has recovered from coronavirus disease, within 6 months from the issuing date of the certificate of recovery (a resolution concerning recovered individuals more than 6 months after recovery who have not been vaccinated is being reviewed).
- Anyone who recovered from coronavirus disease and received at least one vaccine dose.
Sorry Facebook, forced universal vaccinations are not the answer
On August 5, 2021, we warned against the Biden regime’s forced universal vaccination policy, and Facebook promptly censored us.amp.washingtontimes.com
Izrael:
The Vaccination Policy and the New Green Pass that will Take Effect Soon
This website provides government information and enables users to perform government-related transactions onlinewww.gov.il
Aha, potem se tudi WHO moti:Spet neke "teorije", novi sevi pa so se vsi razvili iz slabo precepljenih območij.
As reflected in the WHO’s concerns, sound science strongly suggests that the more you vaccinate, the more likely you will spawn vaccine-resistant mutations. Therefore, the more likely those who have been vaccinated will fall prey to the mutations. To put this another way, minimizing the number of people vaccinated is the BEST way to protect the most vulnerable – and most efficiently allocate scarce vaccine supplies around the world.
It is this simple Darwinian principle of virology that Facebook’s censors can’t seem to wrap their heads around. They argue mutations will occur whether the virus encounters antibodies generated by vaccines or antibodies generated by those previously infected. But here’s the critical difference: The mutations that develop when the virus encounters vaccinated people will be far better armed to defeat the vaccine than the mutations that otherwise develop from far more diverse “wild-spike” and other viral proteins. So the more people you vaccinate, the more vaccine-resistant mutations you get, and in the vaccine “arms race,” the more need for ever more potent boosters.
And here’s the worst-case – but by no means low probability – scenario: By vaccinating the entire population of the country (and world) with spike protein, you risk developing a “super virus” capable of evading globally harmonized immunity and putting everyone back at high risk yet again.
V prvem odstavku je zapisana trditev, da je najboljša zaščita ranljivih necepljenje - trdiš da WHO ne priporoča cepljenja?Aha, potem se tudi WHO moti:
Kok lepo je zavajt s stevilkami ane?
Najboljša zaščita ranljivil je cepljenje le njih in ne cepljenje vseh ostalih vsepovprek.V prvem odstavku je zapisana trditev, da je najboljša zaščita ranljivih necepljenje - trdiš da WHO ne priporoča cepljenja?
Kaj je tukaj zavajanje?Kok lepo je zavajt s stevilkami ane?
Mogoče da tako pravi kakšna študija, WHO priporoča cepljenje večine populacije, čim vecji %. Zadržek imajo pri mlajših pa še to zaradi pomanjkanja cepiva.Najboljša zaščita ranljivil je cepljenje le njih in ne cepljenje vseh ostalih vsepovprek.
Tudi za to je že študija, sem jo nekam prilimal, pa se mi je ne da več iskati.
Ampak, ampak... Potem se ne da več zavajati s številkami.Tretji stolpec. Racunat mors procent okuzenih od cepljene populacije in procent okuzenih od necepljene populacije in primerjat te dve stevilke. Tretji stolpec ne pove nic.
ce je pa dr malone nooooo, izumitelj mrna cepiv!!!!!!!!1111111Ampak, ampak... Potem se ne da več zavajati s številkami.