Kaj bi pa lahko bilo nateg?Evo še enga ki se strikno drži ukrepov (če ni nateg)
Kaj bi pa lahko bilo nateg?Evo še enga ki se strikno drži ukrepov (če ni nateg)
A zato imajo televizije že pred vsako oddajo ali filmom starejšega datuma izpisano opozorilo, da je bilo posneto pred covid epidemijo. Ker sicer folk klicari, grozi, daje na facebook in alter, prijavlja policiji in podobne gluposti glede domnevnega neupoštevanja ukrepov.Da bi dal lanski posnetek.......
Če je napisal spodaj da je najboljši shod danes, potem je od lani, ni druge.Da bi dal lanski posnetek.......
Če je napisal spodaj da je najboljši shod danes, potem je od lani, ni druge.
Se strinjam Ampak ko se je sprejemal zakon o redarstvu ste ploskali.Redar je nič vredna oseba. Če si kolikor toliko normalen ne boš za lokalne šerife nadlegoval folka iz ovinkov itd.sam redar se lahko ob takem prizoru nasmehne in odpelje naprej. Ni njegova služba da teži čisto vsem.
Tested positive? There could be as little as a 3% chance it’s correct
This is not the first challenge to the credibility of PCR tests. Many people will be aware that their results have a lot to do with the number of amplifications that are performed, or the ‘cycle threshold.’ This number in most American and European labs is 35–40 cycles, but experts have claimed that even 35 cycles is far too many, and that a more reasonable protocol would call for 25–30 cycles. (Each cycle exponentially increases the amount of viral DNA in the sample).
The Portuguese judges cited a study conducted by “some of the leading European and world specialists,” which was published by Oxford Academic at the end of September. It showed that if someone tested positive for Covid at a cycle threshold of 35 or higher, the chances of that person actually being infected is less than three percent, and that “the probability of… receiving a false positive is 97% or higher.”
Landmark legal ruling finds that Covid tests are not fit for purpose. So what do the MSM do? They ignore it
Four German holidaymakers who were illegally quarantined in Portugal after one was judged to be positive for Covid-19 have won their case, in a verdict that condemns the widely-used PCR test as being up to 97-percent unreliable.www.rt.com
Cas je da nehas nabijat z replikacijskim stevilom ker te nebuloze ki jih beremo v anticovid medijih nimajo nobene osnove. Kar pokaze tudi stanje na terenu in v polnih bolnisnicah. Nekaj problemov z visokim replikacijkim svetilom je bilo v prvem valu ko so sploh umerjali mnozicna testiranja. Sicer so prakticno vsa testiranja do okoli ct 30. Kar je bilo tudi pojasnjeno pa nekateri veselo ignorirajo in nabijajo dalje. Vse kar je vec se tudi oznaci in ne gre za "pavsalno" pozitivne teste. Drugace pa nekdo ki je potencialno "pozitiven" na visoko replikacijsko stevilo je kvecjemu taksnen ki je v zadnjem mescu dveh (vecinoma) asimptomatsko prebolel virus.
Sej ne nabijam jaz. Obrni se na avtorja clanka.
Kot sem ti ze rekel, obrni se na avtorja clanka:Seveda, samo 3% je pozitivnih. Ostali pa so bolani ker so zrtve paranormalnega delovanja v skopu x-files.
Bi na jugu rekli:"Andy, kod tebe stvarno prolaze svakave gluposti..."
By Peter Andrews, Irish science journalist and writer based in London. He has a background in life sciences, and graduated from the University of Glasgow with a degree in genetics.
Kot sem ti ze rekel, obrni se na avtorja clanka:
Ocitno se potem tudi tile majstri motijo:Enim to res ne gre v glavo
PCR nikoli NE BO pozitiven, tudi če narediš 100+ ciklov, če v vzorcu NI virusa ali vsaj delčka genoma virusa, ki se ga pomnožuje.
Tako da lažnega zaznavanja ni. Lahko pa so napačne interpretacije rezultatov.
The Portuguese judges cited a study conducted by “some of the leading European and world specialists,” which was published by Oxford Academic at the end of September. It showed that if someone tested positive for Covid at a cycle threshold of 35 or higher, the chances of that person actually being infected is less than three percent, and that “the probability of… receiving a false positive is 97% or higher.”
The correlation between the scanner values and the positivity of the culture allows us to observe that the image obtained with 10 times more isolates than in our preliminary work (1941 vs 129) does not change significantly (Figure 1). It can be observed that at Ct = 25, up to 70% of patients remain positive in culture and that at Ct = 30 this value drops to 20%. At Ct = 35, the value we used to report a positive result for PCR, % of cultures are positive. Our Ct value of 35, initially based on the results obtained by RT-PCR on control negative samples in our laboratory and initial results of cultures [8], is validated by the results herein presented and is in correlation with what was proposed in Korea [9] and Taiwan [10]. We could observe that subcultures, especially the first one, allow an increasing percentage of viral isolation in samples with Ct values, confirming that these high Ct values are mostly correlated with low viral loads. From our cohort, we now need to try to understand and define the duration and frequency of live virus shedding in patients on a case-by-case basis in the rare cases when the PCR is positive beyond 10 days, often at a Ct >30. In any cases, these rare cases should not impact public health decisions.