T-2 vprašanje

Citat:
Uporabnik gasdopodna pravi:
KSZ. Če v poslovalnici vrneš kakšno opremo, ti za to izdajo potrdilo ?

Klikni za razširitev

Citat:
Uporabnik gasdopodna pravi:
KSZ. Če v poslovalnici vrneš kakšno opremo, ti za to izdajo potrdilo ?

Klikni za razširitev

Citat:
Uporabnik stein pravi:
Namreč službe, ki snemajo oddajo in pozneje dajo na voljo stranki, so v evopi povečini prepovedane.

Klikni za razširitev

Citat:
Uporabnik Bush pravi:

Citat:
Uporabnik stein pravi:
Namreč službe, ki snemajo oddajo in pozneje dajo na voljo stranki, so v evopi povečini prepovedane.

Klikni za razširitev

To je malo izboljšani time-shift. Gledaš lahko samo tisto, kar je bilo posneto v zadnjih dveh dnevih, ne pa celotnega arhiva TV kanala. Torej to ni snemanje za hrambo.

Klikni za razširitev

Citat:
Uporabnik BureKm pravi:
Namen ni važen. Gre se za proces. In znotraj tega poteka snemanje s strani operaterja, kar pa ni dovoljeno. Sklepam, da T-2 igra na to, da so (pre)majhni, da bi se jih kdo lotil.

Klikni za razširitev

Citat:
Cablevision litigation

After announcing the RS-DVR in March 2006, several content providers including 20th Century Fox, Universal Studios, and Walt Disney sued Cablevision in federal district court. The content providers sought a permanent injunction that would effectively prevent Cablevision from implementing the system. The content providers prevailed at the district court level, and Cablevision appealed. On August 5, 2008, the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals reversed the lower court decision that found the use of RS-DVRs in violation of copyright law.[1] It agreed with Cablevision's argument that a RS-DVR should be treated essentially the same as a customer owned DVR. Only the location of the DVR really differs.

Certain content providers began the process of appealing to the U.S. Supreme Court, seeking cert in late 2008. The Supreme Court delayed hearing the case and instead referred it to the United States Solicitor General's office for the federal government's opinion on the case. In June 2009 the US Supreme Court refused to hear a final appeal in the Cablevision remote DVR case, thereby bringing the years-long litigation to a close.

Future of RS-DVRs

As the Cablevision litigation had a favorable outcome, the future looks bright for RS-DVR systems. Many major cable companies are expected to implement their own RS-DVR systems, as RS-DVRs allow wider access to DVRs at a lesser cost to subscribers and innovative new methods of advertising that appeal to advertisers.

RS-DVRs have been launched in countries like Singapore (recordTV.com), Italy (Faucet PVR), Germany (shift.tv), Finland (tvkaista.fi) and other European countries.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Network_DVR

Klikni za razširitev

Citat:
Uporabnik BureKm pravi:
Namen ni važen. Gre se za proces. In znotraj tega poteka snemanje s strani operaterja, kar pa ni dovoljeno. Sklepam, da T-2 igra na to, da so (pre)majhni, da bi se jih kdo lotil.

EDIT: Enako velja za Amis, IMO.

Klikni za razširitev