Peka mp3 na CD

Citat:
Uporabnik Fadil pravi:
CD-je pečem samo z v avto, ker doma poslušam preko računalnika in Winamp! Mp3 predvajalnik ne uporabljam, saj nisem 20 letnik, ampak vseeno. Za v avto...

Klikni za razširitev

Citat:
All in all, I was impressed by the quality of MP3's vs CD. Unlike the preconceived notions I had when I set out to do these tests, the 192Kbps MP3 was indeed "near CD quality." The degradation was indeed subtle, but noticeable. It is my belief, however, that on the HiFi setup the 192Kbps MP3 is more fatiguing to the ears during extended listening. Surprisingly, 256Kbps and 320Kbps MP3 were virtually indistinguishable by my ears from the CD, except for a light boost in the upper midrange and treble.

So what does this all mean? My feeling is that 192Kbps MP3 is more than adequate for listening with a computer or in a car. The distortion and lousy frequency response of the systems themselves (as well as the high ambient noise in a car) make the 192Kbps MP3 sound so similar to the original CD that the advantage of the smaller storage requirements of the MP3 far outweigh the sonic benefits of the CD. It's nice to have 5-6 audio CD's worth of music on a single MP3 CD - almost like having a CD changer in your hands. On the other hand, for critical listening on a HiFi, I feel that 256Kbps is the best bitrate to use, because it sounds significantly better than 192Kbps. Since I couldn't hear any improvement at all when going to up to 320Kbps, I don't recommend going this high for the simple reason that the file sizes are significantly larger.

MP3's ripped with BladeENC sound far better than I expected, and I believe that most listeners (except neurotic audiophiles those with extremely expensive equipment who claim that $800/meter speaker cables sound significantly better than my cheap but high quality 12 gauge stranded copper cables) would find that the difference in audio quality between the original CD's and 256Kbps MP3 is insignificant.

Klikni za razširitev

Citat:
Vse v vsem, sem bil navdušen nad kakovostjo MP3 CD vs. V nasprotju s predsodkom pojmi sem imel, ko sem določenimi za te teste, MP3 192Kbps je bil res "skoraj CD kakovosti." Razgradnje je bil res subtilna, vendar opazna. To je moje prepričanje pa je, da na setup HiFi MP3 192Kbps je bolj naporna za ušesa med podaljša poslušanju. Presenetljivo, 256 kbps in 320Kbps MP3 so se skoraj ne razlikuje po ušesih s CD-ja, razen za svetlobo povečanje v zgornjem srenje in potrojili.

Torej, kaj vse to pomeni? Moj občutek je, da je 192Kbps MP3 več kot primerna za poslušanje z računalniško ali v avtu. Izkrivljanje in zanič frekvenčni odziv samih sistemov (kot tudi velikim hrupom iz okolja v avto), da 192Kbps MP3 zveni tako podobna originalni CD, da prednost manjših shranjevanje zahteve MP3 veliko večje sonic koristi CD. Lepo je, da so vredni 5-6 avdio CD-jev glasbe na enem CD MP3 - skoraj tako kot imajo CD izmenjevalnik v vaših rokah. Po drugi strani, za kritično poslušanje na HiFi, menim, da 256 kbps je najboljši bitrate za uporabo, saj zveni precej boljša od 192Kbps. Ker nisem slišala nobenega izboljšanja, kdaj bo do 320Kbps, jaz ne priporočamo, bo to zelo preprostega razloga, da so velikosti datotek bistveno večji.

MP3 je raztrgala z BladeEnc zvok veliko boljši, kot sem pričakoval, in verjamem, da je večina poslušalcev (razen nevrotični audiophiles tistih z izjemno drago opremo, ki trdijo, da je zvok $ kabli zvočnikov 800/meter bistveno boljši od mojega poceni, vendar visoke kakovosti 12 merilnik nasedli bakrenih kablov) bi ugotovijo, da je razlika v kakovosti zvoka med je izvirni CD in MP3 256 kbps nepomembni.

Klikni za razširitev