Vojna v Ukrajini 2

Generik

Guru
14. maj 2011
3.885
1.271
113
Mogoče pa bi, pa drugi nočejo nič kupiti od nje, ozeroma ne morejo zaradi sankcij :evil:

Sicer pa so v SK kar lepo trgovali s Kitajci, Japonci, JK in še kom pred korono. Zdej se počasi spet odpirajo
Kaj pravi chat gpt na to temo? Pa poglejmo...


what is north korea exporting the most to other countries and in what extent?





As of my last update in 2022, North Korea's exports were largely centered around minerals, metallurgical products, manufactures (including armaments), textiles (especially clothing), agricultural and fishery products. Due to various international sanctions imposed on the country over the years, data about North Korea's exact export quantities and its recipients have been elusive and often based on estimates. Here's a general breakdown:
  1. Minerals: Coal has been a major export item, particularly to China. Despite United Nations sanctions that intend to curb North Korea's coal exports due to its nuclear program, there have been reports of these exports continuing, albeit illicitly.
  2. Metallurgical Products: This includes iron and non-ferrous metals. Again, China has been a major destination for these products.
  3. Textiles: North Korea has a sizable textile industry, exporting products like clothes to various countries. This sector has also faced sanctions, but illicit trading routes have been known to exist.
  4. Seafood: Before sanctions were tightened, seafood, including crab and shrimp, was a notable export, primarily to China.
  5. Manufactures: This category includes various goods, but armaments are particularly notable. North Korea has been known to export weapons and related technologies to several countries and non-state actors, in defiance of international sanctions.
  6. Agricultural products: These play a smaller role in exports but still contribute to trade, primarily with neighboring countries.
International sanctions, especially those imposed by the United Nations, have aimed to curtail North Korea's export capabilities, especially for items that could finance its nuclear and missile programs. Nevertheless, the country has continued to find ways to export goods through illicit means, using tactics like ship-to-ship transfers to avoid detection.
China has been, by far, North Korea's largest trading partner, and most of its legitimate and illicit exports are directed towards China. This relationship has been a point of contention in international diplomacy, as China's enforcement of international sanctions on North Korea has varied over the years.
Remember, these are broad strokes based on information up to 2022. The situation can change, and it's always a good idea to refer to the latest trade reports or international assessments for the most current data.




how western countries are helping north korea with aid?




Western countries have a long history of providing humanitarian assistance to North Korea, primarily in the form of food aid and medical supplies. This assistance is often channeled through international organizations and non-governmental organizations (NGOs). Here's a breakdown of the assistance from some Western countries and entities:
  1. United States: Historically, the U.S. has been a major provider of food assistance to North Korea, especially during the 1990s when the country faced severe famine. However, direct aid from the U.S. to North Korea has been sporadic in recent years, influenced by political tensions and concerns about the diversion of aid. When it does provide assistance, it is often through the World Food Programme (WFP) and other UN agencies.
  2. European Union (EU): The EU has provided North Korea with humanitarian assistance since 1995. This aid typically comes in the form of food, nutritional supplements, and medical aid. Like other donors, the EU channels its aid through UN agencies and NGOs to ensure it reaches those in need and isn't diverted.
  3. Individual European Countries: Countries like Sweden, Germany, and Switzerland have, at various times, provided bilateral and multilateral assistance to North Korea. This assistance is usually focused on food, healthcare, and capacity-building.
  4. Canada: Canada has provided humanitarian aid to North Korea, mainly during times of natural disasters or severe food shortages. This aid is typically channeled through international organizations.
Regardless of the donor, providing aid to North Korea comes with challenges. The North Korean regime often places restrictions on the monitoring and distribution of aid, leading to concerns about diversion for non-humanitarian uses. As a result, donors often have to balance the immediate humanitarian needs of the North Korean people with concerns about supporting or legitimizing the regime.
It's also worth noting that humanitarian aid is typically kept separate from political issues. Despite the many political and security challenges associated with North Korea, many Western countries and organizations believe that the North Korean people shouldn't be made to suffer due to the actions of their government. Hence, they provide aid based on humanitarian principles of neutrality and impartiality.




why everyone is providing aid to north korea if they act hostile to majority of these countries?




The decision to provide humanitarian aid to North Korea, despite its often hostile posture towards many donor countries, is complex and multi-faceted. Here are some of the reasons why countries and international organizations choose to offer assistance:
  1. Humanitarian Principles: One of the core principles of humanitarian aid is to offer help based on need, without discrimination. Many Western countries and international organizations believe that political disagreements with a regime should not prevent the delivery of aid to people who are suffering. Essentially, they draw a distinction between the actions of a government and the needs of its people.
  2. Preventing Wider Instability: Instability in North Korea, particularly in the form of a humanitarian crisis, could have broader implications for regional stability. Mass migration, conflicts over resources, and the potential for internal unrest in North Korea could affect neighboring countries and potentially lead to a broader regional crisis.
  3. Engagement and Diplomacy: Providing aid can be a form of engagement, offering a point of contact and dialogue between North Korea and the outside world. While this dialogue is focused on humanitarian issues, it can also serve as a bridge for other discussions.
  4. Concerns about Diversion: Some countries believe that by providing aid, they can exert some influence over how it's distributed and thereby reduce the chances of it being diverted to the military or elite, which might be more likely if North Korea relies solely on less scrupulous sources.
  5. Moral Responsibility: Many countries feel a moral duty to help those in need, irrespective of their government's behavior. The humanitarian crises in North Korea, especially the famines of the 1990s, have been severe, and the suffering of the North Korean people is well-documented.
  6. Domestic and International Pressure: Non-governmental organizations (NGOs), advocacy groups, and international bodies can exert pressure on governments to provide aid, especially in acute crises.
  7. Soft Power and Image Building: Providing aid can also serve to enhance the image of donor countries, showing them as compassionate and concerned about global well-being, rather than just political power plays.
While these reasons motivate many countries to provide aid, it's worth noting that this assistance is not without controversy. Critics argue that providing aid can prop up the North Korean regime, allowing it to divert its own resources to its nuclear and missile programs. They also raise concerns about the lack of transparency and the potential for aid to be diverted from those who need it most.
In response, many aid agencies have sought to put monitoring mechanisms in place and work to ensure that aid reaches the intended recipients. However, the opaque nature of the North Korean regime and its restrictions on foreign monitors make this a challenging task.
 

AndY1

Guru
Osebje foruma
18. sep 2007
22.072
4.075
113
Zakaj bi pošiljali, če pa so se pripravljali 8 let, pa produkcijo imajo daleč višjo kot ves zahod. To potem pomeni, da kvasiš neumnosti :valjamse:

Western ammo stocks at ‘bottom of the barrel’ as Ukraine war drags on, NATO official warns​



Britain has ‘run out of arms to send to Ukraine’​


A bo, smeško? Ker samo smeški ti še ostajajo, ki jih copy-paste-as iz posta v post. Celotna 'zgodba' se ti sesuva in prihaja realnost, ki se ji ne da ubežati.

Med tem casom, torej v casu vojne, so rusi skoraj ze postavili 2 novi zelezniski progi proti Mariopolu. Kaj mislis, cemu bosta sluzili?

Poleg tega:
 
Nazadnje urejeno:

corsol

Guru
11. mar 2010
2.856
894
113

Western ammo stocks at ‘bottom of the barrel’ as Ukraine war drags on, NATO official warns​



Britain has ‘run out of arms to send to Ukraine’​


A bo, smeško? Ker samo smeški ti še ostajajo. Celotna 'zgodba' se ti sesuva in prihaja realnost, ki se ji ne da ubežati.
Od kdaj pa ti zahodnim MSM verjameš ?

CNN .....OMG !
 
  • Haha
Reactions: sad

AndY1

Guru
Osebje foruma
18. sep 2007
22.072
4.075
113
Od kdaj pa ti zahodnim MSM verjameš ?

CNN .....OMG !

Kot sem napisal. Realnost te prej kot slej dohiti. In te realnost tudi Zahodni korporacijski mediji ne morejo vec ubezati.

Med tem v Rusiji:

 
  • Haha
Reactions: damirj

corsol

Guru
11. mar 2010
2.856
894
113
Kot sem napisal. Realnost te prej kot slej dohiti. In te realnost tudi Zahodni korporacijski mediji ne morejo vec ubezati.

Med tem v Rusiji:

Russia has ramped up the production of some military hardware by more than tenfold to supply its army in Ukraine, significantly increasing the output of missiles, drones, combat vehicles and artillery, Russia's biggest weapons producer said on Tuesday.
 
  • Všeč mi je
Reactions: sad

Vadim

Guru
2. jul 2020
4.755
6.198
113
Kot sem napisal. Realnost te prej kot slej dohiti. In te realnost tudi Zahodni korporacijski mediji ne morejo vec ubezati.

Med tem v Rusiji:



Ti o tej realnsti pišeš že od začetka leta, pa še vedno ne zmanjkuje:


Poglej september mesec.




Med tem pa tvoji rusi hodijo v severno korejo po strelivo, ker imajo tako bolano visoko proizvodnjo. Predlagam, da se tebi da titulo The Ghost of Alter, ker si enaka zabloda.
 

damirj

Guru
9. maj 2012
5.150
2.332
113
Kot sem napisal. Realnost te prej kot slej dohiti. In te realnost tudi Zahodni korporacijski mediji ne morejo vec ubezati.

Med tem v Rusiji:


Ruska propaganda. Proizvodnja frač in zobotrebcev je lahko zrasla za 10x, vse ostalo pa je padlo za 20x. Dokaze so ti že drugi naflikali, čakamo pa še tvoje, ki niso samo neke besede, pač pa točne številke, prosim.
 

delter333

Guru
21. maj 2010
1.822
1.523
113
Notranjska
Kot sem napisal. Realnost te prej kot slej dohiti. In te realnost tudi Zahodni korporacijski mediji ne morejo vec ubezati.

Med tem v Rusiji:

Se ti ne zdi da mora zahod nekako upravičiti povečanje proizvodnje in kapacitete vsega tega orožja? Vojaška doktrina veleva da nikoli ne sme zmanjkat rezerv. A ti nisem to že razlagal na podlagi zračne obrambe? Hočeš inštrukcije še za F16?
 

hermann

Guru
19. mar 2014
9.581
6.385
113
ni dvoma, da bo tudi rusofilska falanga na alterju do jutri prišla na plano s posnetki, serijskimi številkami itd.

danes so še glave v pesku
 
  • Všeč mi je
Reactions: sad in 8888

hdx

Guru
1. jun 2011
1.544
2.259
113
Kaj mislite, koliko nato generalov je bilo ubitih v tem napadu? Jaz mislim, da vsaj 300