Vojna v Ukrajini 2
- Ustvarjalec teme sad
- Začetni datum
Ruski generali o uporabi jedrskega orožja, v Evropo nove ameriške bojne glave | 24ur.com
Več neimenovanih višjih ameriški uradnikov je za The New York Times razkrilo, da naj bi ruski generali, sicer v Putinovi odsotnosti, razpravljali o uporabi jedrskega orožja v Ukrajini. V Bidnovi administraciji zato pozorno spremljajo dogajanje v Kremlju in resno jemljejo Putinova opozorila ter...
"
US Air Force Brig. Gen. Pat Ryder acknowledged during an official briefing yesterday that active-duty US military personnel are not only deployed inside of Ukraine, but are operating far away from the US embassy in Kiev.
The day before, an unnamed US Department of Defense official said at a background briefing that “U.S. personnel” had “resumed on-site inspections to assess weapon stocks” in Ukraine."
During Tuesday’s on-camera briefing, Travis Tritten of military.com asked, “The military has personnel inside of Ukraine, who are doing weapons inspections now. I’m wondering what the rules of engagement for those personnel are if they are fired on by the Russians or they are targeted by the Russians.”
Ryder replied, “We do have small teams that are comprised of embassy personnel that are conducting some inspections of security assistance delivery at a variety of locations.”
“My understanding is that they would be well far away from any type of frontline actions, we are relying on the Ukrainians to do that, we are relying on other partners to do that…. They’re not going to be operating on the front lines.”
He continued, “We’ve been very clear there are no combat forces in Ukraine, no US forces conducting combat operations in Ukraine, these are personnel that are assigned to conduct security cooperation and assistance as part of the defense attaché office.”
To this, Tritten replied, “But this would be different because they would be working outside the embassy. I would just ask if people should read this as an escalation.”
Ryder claimed that the US action was not escalatory, and simply refused to answer Tritten’s question about what the US would do if any active-duty US troops were killed.
US Air Force Brig. Gen. Pat Ryder acknowledged during an official briefing yesterday that active-duty US military personnel are not only deployed inside of Ukraine, but are operating far away from the US embassy in Kiev.
The day before, an unnamed US Department of Defense official said at a background briefing that “U.S. personnel” had “resumed on-site inspections to assess weapon stocks” in Ukraine."
During Tuesday’s on-camera briefing, Travis Tritten of military.com asked, “The military has personnel inside of Ukraine, who are doing weapons inspections now. I’m wondering what the rules of engagement for those personnel are if they are fired on by the Russians or they are targeted by the Russians.”
Ryder replied, “We do have small teams that are comprised of embassy personnel that are conducting some inspections of security assistance delivery at a variety of locations.”
“My understanding is that they would be well far away from any type of frontline actions, we are relying on the Ukrainians to do that, we are relying on other partners to do that…. They’re not going to be operating on the front lines.”
He continued, “We’ve been very clear there are no combat forces in Ukraine, no US forces conducting combat operations in Ukraine, these are personnel that are assigned to conduct security cooperation and assistance as part of the defense attaché office.”
To this, Tritten replied, “But this would be different because they would be working outside the embassy. I would just ask if people should read this as an escalation.”
Ryder claimed that the US action was not escalatory, and simply refused to answer Tritten’s question about what the US would do if any active-duty US troops were killed.
Nekaj se dogaja: St. Petersburg
Rusia, Rusia, Rusia,...... This is it! Revolution! Putin is fucked!
Rusia, Rusia, Rusia,...... This is it! Revolution! Putin is fucked!
in vojne bi bilo v 3 dneh konec ali kaj
a je kdo omenjal 3 dni?
sej bi blo ze dovolj, ce bi jih v zraku onesposobili. po kopnem vidimo, da ne morejo nic.
Vojna se lahko sploh ne bi začela. Če bi NATO ne spal.
Antonovski most ponovno na udaru. Huda natančnost projektilov.
Answer to How could Russia's Army run out of fuel if Russia is one of the biggest oil exporter? And couldn't they just resupply the army with the huge amount of oil they have/produce? by Eddie Bourke https://truthaboutrussia.quora.com/...share=f8c42816&srid=uQjZEh&target_type=answer