Napetost v Ukrajini - Krimu

Citat:
Uporabnik Ytbnd pravi:
Na koncu take vojne Rusije nebi bilo več, kar bi ostalo bi zavzeli Kitajci.

Klikni za razširitev

Citat:
Uporabnik darjan pravi:
Dobro z dobrim bo ukrajina, ko se bo tako zapufala, da bo morala pljuvat kri, da poplača zadeve.

Klikni za razširitev

Citat:

...
Up until a few years ago, every army unit had to fill its ranks with reservists before it could deploy for battle. The top brass switched to a focus on creating divisions and units in a constant state of battle readiness, made up of professional soldiers and ready to deploy soon after receiving the order.

As a result, when Putin issued the order for a so-called "snap inspection" last March and April, the army deployed upward of 40,000 to 50,000 troops to the Ukrainian border in just 24 hours.

But now we see the other side of that coin. In March 2014 the Kremlin refused to repeat the "Crimean scenario" in eastern and southern Ukraine.

It would have proven simple enough to seize the Donetsk and Luhansk regions at that time, but a far more daunting task to create a new border — or "line of demarcation" as it is now called — and to set up military checkpoints at the hundreds or even thousands of roads intersecting it, and defend them over a long period of time. That is a task calling for many more than the 40,000 to 50,000 soldiers currently available.

And even now when the battle-ready units send out only their tactical battalions, they experience a personnel shortage that is becoming increasingly difficult to fill.

There is no escaping the fact that, for the last several years, the Russian armed forces have been organized according to the model first proposed by former U.S. Secretary of State Colin Powell who said that troops should be used for as short a time as possible, should deploy on a massive scale and should immediately withdraw after attaining their objective. However, the war in Ukraine imposes a different set of requirements.

That is why the military chiefs are now faced with the need to increase the number of troops. But Russia lacks the required number of professional soldiers. That means they must send conscript soldiers to the border.

But because conscripts serve for only one year, they cannot be deployed before their first six months of training, and then six months later, the next group must rotate in. That is why Russia's military leaders might have concluded that they need to force or trick conscripts into signing on for longer stints.

Klikni za razširitev

Citat:
Uporabnik boomslang pravi:

Citat:
Uporabnik Ytbnd pravi:
Na koncu take vojne Rusije nebi bilo več, kar bi ostalo bi zavzeli Kitajci.

Klikni za razširitev

Pa dajte no že nehat prodajat pravljice..... Vsaj sem in tja si odprite kakšen defence ali military forum in se malo poučite.... Dejstvo je, da ima Rusija najmočnejšo kopensko vojsko na svetu... Dejstvo je, da je poleg ZDA edina država na svetu, ki je samozadostna... In dejstvo je, da je moderna tehnologija že tako ispopolnjena, da je vsakršna vojna med NATOm in Rusijo nesmiselna... Edino, kar lahko obstoja so proxi vojne ali hibridni spopadi in to je vse.... Sploh pa ne omenjajte v vojaškem kontekstu Evropo brez USA... Evropa sama po sebi je v vojaškem smislu po WWII palček in prav USA in NATOu se lahko zahvalimo, da je tako...

Klikni za razširitev

Citat:

v konvencionalni vojni so itak najbolj važni kanon futri, teh evropa res nima dovolj, rusija pa na pretek, podobno azija.

Klikni za razširitev

Citat:

težava je v tem, da zahod ne zna pomagati
na kocu se bi vojskovali amer & co proti ruskim prostovoljcem. lahko si predstavljaš kakšna štala bi potem bila, ker bi prostovoljci naenkrat imeli tudi najnovejšo rusko tehniko

Klikni za razširitev

Citat:

140 milijonska Rusija ima več kanonfutra kot 500 milijonska Eu ?

Klikni za razširitev