Lepote multikulturnosti 4

dask

Majstr
21. sep 2023
580
655
93
Še en ukrep za brezveze... mene bodo drkal na mejnem prehodu, ilegalci se bodo pa sprehodil 500m stran skozi grmovje. Nobenega efekta, ker je celotna zadeva planirana tako, kot poteka.
 

ferdo

Guru
3. sep 2007
10.930
4.050
113
Ljubljana
hmpg.net
"Haiti's struggles after 1804 independence stem from both external and internal factors. Externally, France imposed a 150-million-franc debt, draining Haiti's economy for 122 years. The U.S. occupation (1915–1934) controlled finances, diverting 40% of income to debt repayment. These actions suggest intentional efforts to limit Haiti, driven by economic and racial motives. Internally, political instability, corruption, and natural disasters like the 2010 earthquake hindered progress. Poor infrastructure and illiteracy also played roles. While external pressures were significant, internal challenges were equally critical, creating a complex barrier to prosperity."
Če tole preberem, so ga po osamosvojitvi dirkali Francozi, potem pa USA.. nekako klasična zgodba kolonij.
 
  • Všeč mi je
Reactions: jest5

brane_new

Guru
10. feb 2008
17.819
2.667
113
Slovenija ni brez pravil. Zakon o varstvu osebnih podatkov (ZVOP-2) jasno določa, da ni dovoljeno fotografirati oseb brez njihovega dovoljenja, še posebej mladoletnikov, če gre za objavo v javnem prostoru.

Vsaka oseba, ki smatra, da je neupravičenao snemana naj poda dokazila o tem in zahtevek za izbris!
 
  • Objave ne odobravam
  • Všeč mi je
Reactions: optiplex in aljoman

Mr_Wolf

Guru
8. jan 2008
3.293
3.757
113
Prve mlade družinice so se že vselile v krasna, nova državna stanovanja, kjer bodo za socialno najemnino lahko prebivali večno.
Pokažimo jim kako smo jih veseli - dobrodošli :cheer: :
dunaj.jpg
 

mosseero

fizik´alc
3. sep 2007
20.490
11.503
113
kod Džej-Zija
Zgodovinsko gledano je znanih več primerov, ko je muslimanom uspelo ob določenem deležu populacije uvesti šeriatsko pravo. Ta delež je včasih zadoščal pri 10 %.
 
  • Všeč mi je
Reactions: Matey

ferdo

Guru
3. sep 2007
10.930
4.050
113
Ljubljana
hmpg.net
Sharia law as primary or exclusive source of national legislation:
  • Saudi Arabia – Fully based on Hanbali interpretation of Sharia; no formal civil or criminal code.
  • Iran – Shia interpretation of Sharia governs most legal aspects.
  • Afghanistan – Under Taliban rule, strict Deobandi interpretation of Sharia applies.
  • Sudan – Reintroduced Sharia law under military leadership after democratic rollback
Countries where have parallel systems where Sharia courts govern personal matters (e.g., marriage, divorce, inheritance) for Muslims only:
  • Nigeria – In 12 northern states, Sharia governs both civil and criminal law for Muslims.
  • Pakistan – Civil law dominates, but Sharia courts have authority in key areas (e.g., Hudood laws, family law).
  • Indonesia – National law is secular, but Aceh province enforces Sharia law (including criminal penalties).
  • Malaysia – Dual system; Sharia courts handle family and personal issues for Muslims.
  • United Arab Emirates – Civil law system influenced heavily by Sharia, especially in family and moral cases.
  • Qatar, Bahrain, Kuwait, Oman – Mix of civil and Sharia law, particularly in family and inheritance matters.
Sharia law is applied solely to Muslims in areas such as marriage, divorce, child custody, and inheritance:
  • Egypt
  • Jordan
  • Morocco
  • Algeria
  • Tunisia
  • Libya
  • Syria
  • Iraq
  • Bangladesh
  • India – Muslim Personal Law applies to Muslims under a religious community-based legal system.
  • Kenya – Limited application in Kadhi courts for family law among Muslims.
Non-Muslim minorities: Generally not subject to Sharia, but enforcement can vary.
Criminal law: Full Sharia criminal codes (hudud punishments) are rare and mainly enforced in Saudi Arabia, Afghanistan, and parts of Nigeria.

Definitivno, vse te države (ali pa vsaj večina) ima 10% muslimanov (ali pa malo več)
 

Matey

AlterZavarovalničar
6. sep 2007
34.559
16.873
113
Zgodovinsko gledano je znanih več primerov, ko je muslimanom uspelo ob določenem deležu populacije uvesti šeriatsko pravo. Ta delež je včasih zadoščal pri 10 %.
Velikost potrebnega deleža je poleg kakšnih drugih zadev močno odvisen tudi od intenzivnosti oz. bolje rečeno agresivnosti tistih, ki si želijo uvesti spremembe. Posledično je 20% lahko še relativno sprejemljiv delež, ki naj ne bi prinesel drastičnih sprememb v kolikor pri teh procentih ekstremisti predstavljajo manjšino. Zadeva je po takem scenariju (pod pogojem dejanskega interesa države ipd.) še rešljiva, če pa ekstremisti predstavljajo polovico ali več od teh 20% (in to je povsem mogoče glede na to kakšna muslimanska sodrga se nabira gor) pa bo vrag lahko vzel šalo relativno kmalu. Do takrat pa se lahko "tolažimo" z raznoraznimi prikazi kako uvedba šeriatskega prava in vedno večji delež muslimanov, ki ima za sodobno družbo vedno prevelik del ekstremistov, v bistvu ni nič posebnega, kaj šele škodljivega.