Citat:
Uporabnik MAKY_ pravi:
vidimo ja kako je z delovanjem aplikacij v appstoreu...
Citat:
Uporabnik MAKY_ pravi:
a ni vseskozi opevano, da so vse aplikacije v appstore testirane,stabilne in brez napak? Ker drugače ne pridejo v appstore?
Citat:
Uporabnik Jest pravi:
Citat:
Uporabnik MAKY_ pravi:
a ni vseskozi opevano, da so vse aplikacije v appstore testirane,stabilne in brez napak? Ker drugače ne pridejo v appstore?
To ni nikjer "opevano"... So sicer stestirane... ampak bolj za to, da ni zlonamerne kode... ki bi lahko kakorkoli skodovala delovanju in stabilnosti samega OS ...
Citat:
Uporabnik tomi pravi:
če še nisi ugotovil v to temo pišejo v 99 % uporabniki androida![]()
Citat:
Our data experts performed an identical series of activities on Google Maps and Apple Maps that included searching for several US cities, addresses and airports and zooming in and out to locate specific locations. On Google Maps, the average data loaded from the cellular network for each step was 1.3MB. Apple Maps came in at 271KB – that's approximately 80% less data! On some actions, such as zooming in to see a particular intersection, Apple Maps' efficiency advantage edged close to 7X.
Citat:
Uporabnik rawr pravi:
Applova maps aplikacija porabi 5x manj podatkov pri prenosu zemljevidov, kot google maps.
Citat:
Our data experts performed an identical series of activities on Google Maps and Apple Maps that included searching for several US cities, addresses and airports and zooming in and out to locate specific locations. On Google Maps, the average data loaded from the cellular network for each step was 1.3MB. Apple Maps came in at 271KB – that's approximately 80% less data! On some actions, such as zooming in to see a particular intersection, Apple Maps' efficiency advantage edged close to 7X.
Citat:
Uporabnik rawr pravi:
Applova maps aplikacija porabi 5x manj podatkov pri prenosu zemljevidov, kot google maps.
Citat:
Our data experts performed an identical series of activities on Google Maps and Apple Maps that included searching for several US cities, addresses and airports and zooming in and out to locate specific locations. On Google Maps, the average data loaded from the cellular network for each step was 1.3MB. Apple Maps came in at 271KB – that's approximately 80% less data! On some actions, such as zooming in to see a particular intersection, Apple Maps' efficiency advantage edged close to 7X.
Citat:
Uporabnik maddog pravi:
Seveda, saj jih je 5x manj na voljo![]()
Citat:
Uporabnik Mr_Orange pravi:
Citat:
Uporabnik rawr pravi:
Applova maps aplikacija porabi 5x manj podatkov pri prenosu zemljevidov, kot google maps.
Citat:
Our data experts performed an identical series of activities on Google Maps and Apple Maps that included searching for several US cities, addresses and airports and zooming in and out to locate specific locations. On Google Maps, the average data loaded from the cellular network for each step was 1.3MB. Apple Maps came in at 271KB – that's approximately 80% less data! On some actions, such as zooming in to see a particular intersection, Apple Maps' efficiency advantage edged close to 7X.
Porabi 5x manj podatkov, najde pa 20x manj naslovov... torej FAIL!![]()
Pa še en FAIL: AppleMaps![]()
Citat:
Uporabnik rawr pravi:
Citat:
Uporabnik Mr_Orange pravi:
Citat:
Uporabnik rawr pravi:
Applova maps aplikacija porabi 5x manj podatkov pri prenosu zemljevidov, kot google maps.
Citat:
Our data experts performed an identical series of activities on Google Maps and Apple Maps that included searching for several US cities, addresses and airports and zooming in and out to locate specific locations. On Google Maps, the average data loaded from the cellular network for each step was 1.3MB. Apple Maps came in at 271KB – that's approximately 80% less data! On some actions, such as zooming in to see a particular intersection, Apple Maps' efficiency advantage edged close to 7X.
Porabi 5x manj podatkov, najde pa 20x manj naslovov... torej FAIL!![]()
Pa še en FAIL: AppleMaps![]()
Malo ti to na pamet ne![]()
Citat:
Uporabnik Mr_Orange pravi:
Citat:
Uporabnik rawr pravi:
Citat:
Uporabnik Mr_Orange pravi:
Citat:
Uporabnik rawr pravi:
Applova maps aplikacija porabi 5x manj podatkov pri prenosu zemljevidov, kot google maps.
Citat:
Our data experts performed an identical series of activities on Google Maps and Apple Maps that included searching for several US cities, addresses and airports and zooming in and out to locate specific locations. On Google Maps, the average data loaded from the cellular network for each step was 1.3MB. Apple Maps came in at 271KB – that's approximately 80% less data! On some actions, such as zooming in to see a particular intersection, Apple Maps' efficiency advantage edged close to 7X.
Porabi 5x manj podatkov, najde pa 20x manj naslovov... torej FAIL!![]()
Pa še en FAIL: AppleMaps![]()
Malo ti to na pamet ne![]()
Najde že, samo verjetno ti Maribor prikaže nekje na Krasu...![]()