Koliko jih je na drugi strani pa nobene pravljice.
Vojna v Ukrajini 2
- Ustvarjalec teme sad
- Začetni datum
Imajo pravljice Rusi;
boj proti svetovnemu nacizmu ki ogroža Rusijo (zanimivo da samo njih)
boj pred grdim zahodom, ki jih na vsak način hoče napasti...
branjenje Ruskih vrednost (padci skozi okno, sodišča podrejena Putinu, usmrtitve v zaporih...)
In še kar nekaj drugih pravljic ki jih Vatniki požirajo kot vodko...
boj proti svetovnemu nacizmu ki ogroža Rusijo (zanimivo da samo njih)
boj pred grdim zahodom, ki jih na vsak način hoče napasti...
branjenje Ruskih vrednost (padci skozi okno, sodišča podrejena Putinu, usmrtitve v zaporih...)
In še kar nekaj drugih pravljic ki jih Vatniki požirajo kot vodko...
Najhujša ruska nočna mora je pa da rusi, ki živijo na zahodu, nočejo domov.
Še hujša nočna mora pa bi bila, če bi Ukrajinci, ki živijo na zahodu hoteli domov in se začeli borit protu Rusom.
Kaj pa ti čakaš, da ne greš v Ukrajino v frontne jarke, Ukrajinci najbolj rabijo pomoć v živi sili ???
Zakaj pa bi šel? Nisem vojak, dlje od Dooma in Unreal Tournamenta nisem prišel. Zakaj pa ti ne greš se borit v rusijo? Mastno plačajo, pa kljub temu na silo novačijo ruske mladce po diskotekah, očitno ni interesa. Javi se ti, boš imel za položnico elektrike in avto natankat.
končno spet malo akcije na fronti
Rusija se pripravlja na akcijo, okoli pomembnega mesta kopiči vojsko. V igri tudi litij
Rusija je blizu vzhodnoukrajinskega mesta Pokrovsk zbrala okoli 110.000 vojakov v prizadevanjih, da bi zavzela to strateško pomembno mesto, je včeraj izjavil ukrajinski vojaški poveljnik Oleksandr Sirski. Območje okoli Pokrovska je označil zawww.dnevnik.si
Najprej je bil grdi zahod in ZDA.
Vmes so bli kao kolegi.
Zaj pa so spet tak tak love / hate.
Povprečn sovjet, ki v to propagandno verjame, ni najbolj oster nož v predalu.
Aja nacizem ? Tak ko dobrodelna organizacija Wagner, ki peče piškote za otroke ?
Res je. Ampak se miljoni ukrajincev, ki živijo na zahodu nočejo boriti proti rusom in ne podpirajo Zelenskega. So na strani rusov.
Tisti piškoti, ki jih je delila Nulandova na Majdanu so pekli wagnerjovci?Najprej je bil grdi zahod in ZDA.
Vmes so bli kao kolegi.
Zaj pa so spet tak tak love / hate.
Povprečn sovjet, ki v to propagandno verjame, ni najbolj oster nož v predalu.
Aja nacizem ? Tak ko dobrodelna organizacija Wagner, ki peče piškote za otroke ?
Ruski prostovoljci ki si želijo umreti za državo Rusijo in velikega voditelja Putleja...
Ups ne, to so nasilno mobilizirano delavci migranti poslani na fronto... samo v obljubljeni deželi Rusiji.
Ups ne, to so nasilno mobilizirano delavci migranti poslani na fronto... samo v obljubljeni deželi Rusiji.
Še ena Ruska laž, ki so jo širili Mirsi in ostali glasniki Kremlja je ovržena...
Če se spomnite je bilo ubito večje število Ukrajinskih zajetih vojakov Julija 2022 v vasi Olenivka, glasniki Kremlja so že takoj dobili navodila,
da je treba širiti novico, da so bili zadeti z HIMARS raketo, preiskava UN je potrdila nasprotno, taborišče je bilo zadeto z termobarično bombo,
kot jih imajo Rusi...
theins.ru
An internal analysis by the United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights has concluded that the explosion at Penal Colony No. 120 in Olenivka, Donetsk region — which killed over 50 Ukrainian prisoners of war on the night of July 28, 2022 — was a deliberate attack carried out by the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation. This was reported by Ukrainian Ombudsman Dmytro Lubinets, citing findings from a report by the Center for Human Rights in Armed Conflict (CHRAC).
According to the UN's findings — and contrary to Russia's claims — no HIMARS missiles were used at Olenivka. The explosions occurred inside the barracks and were caused by artillery shells fired from the southeast — that is, from territory controlled by Russia.
The report states that Russian 120mm thermobaric shells of the 3OF74 type were used. The munitions are known for their high thermal output and powerful blast wave. The strike was carried out using artillery systems equipped with 2A51/60/80/80-1 type guns (possibly the Nona-S, Nona-SVK, Vena, or Hosta), from a distance of 2 to 8 kilometers. These specific characteristics were intended to create a false impression that Western-supplied weapons had been used to strike the barracks where Ukrainian prisoners of war were being held, presumably in order to blame Ukraine for the attack.
The document also notes that the attack appeared to be a staged operation, likely involving the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces, the country’s Investigative Committee, the Federal Penitentiary Service (FSIN), and representatives of the so-called “Donetsk People's Republic.” The involvement of Wagner Group mercenaries as organizers is ruled out by the report. In total, at least 20 individuals may have been involved in planning and covering up the attack, including commanders of the 61st and 155th Naval Infantry Brigades and of the 11th Guards Motor Rifle Regiment.
According to investigators, before the attack, FSIN personnel urgently relocated the prisoners to Barracks 200, where the explosion later occurred. The presumed objective of the attack was to disrupt the supply of Western weapons to Ukraine and to influence the agenda of the United Nations Security Council, which was scheduled to meet the following day.
In his statement, Ukrainian Ombudsman Lubinets emphasized that the Ukrainian side had repeatedly attempted to meet with the UN mission in order to present the collected evidence, but the mission refused to take Kyiv’s findings into consideration. Meanwhile, Russia’s ombudsman declined to participate in a joint visit to the prison. Only a year later, according to Lubinets, did the UN officially acknowledge that Russia’s claim about the use of HIMARS was unfounded.
The Ukrainian ombudsman called the report an important document that should catalyze a full-fledged international investigation. He urged for the public disclosure of the findings and for bringing the culprits to justice.
On the night of July 28, 2022, the explosion at the prison claimed the lives of 53 Ukrainian prisoners of war and injured another 130.
The authorities of the so-called Donetsk “People's Republic,” along with the Russian Ministry of Defense, claimed that the strike on the prison had been carried out by the Ukrainian side using American HIMARS multiple launch rocket systems. However, CNN investigators who analyzed videos, photographs, and satellite images reported that the likelihood of a HIMARS missile strike on the prison was all but nonexistent.
From the very beginning, the Ukrainian side has insisted that the explosion in Olenivka was a terrorist act orchestrated by Russia in an effort to disrupt Western weapons supplies to Kyiv. Among those killed in the 2022 prison strike were fighters from the Azov Regiment, whom Russia was reluctant to exchange, as The Insider reported.
Če se spomnite je bilo ubito večje število Ukrajinskih zajetih vojakov Julija 2022 v vasi Olenivka, glasniki Kremlja so že takoj dobili navodila,
da je treba širiti novico, da so bili zadeti z HIMARS raketo, preiskava UN je potrdila nasprotno, taborišče je bilo zadeto z termobarično bombo,
kot jih imajo Rusi...
UN analysis reveals Olenivka prison was hit by thermobaric munitions fired by Russian Armed Forces, killing Ukrainian POWs
An internal analysis by the United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights has concluded that the explosion at Penal Colony No
theins.ru
An internal analysis by the United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights has concluded that the explosion at Penal Colony No. 120 in Olenivka, Donetsk region — which killed over 50 Ukrainian prisoners of war on the night of July 28, 2022 — was a deliberate attack carried out by the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation. This was reported by Ukrainian Ombudsman Dmytro Lubinets, citing findings from a report by the Center for Human Rights in Armed Conflict (CHRAC).
According to the UN's findings — and contrary to Russia's claims — no HIMARS missiles were used at Olenivka. The explosions occurred inside the barracks and were caused by artillery shells fired from the southeast — that is, from territory controlled by Russia.
The report states that Russian 120mm thermobaric shells of the 3OF74 type were used. The munitions are known for their high thermal output and powerful blast wave. The strike was carried out using artillery systems equipped with 2A51/60/80/80-1 type guns (possibly the Nona-S, Nona-SVK, Vena, or Hosta), from a distance of 2 to 8 kilometers. These specific characteristics were intended to create a false impression that Western-supplied weapons had been used to strike the barracks where Ukrainian prisoners of war were being held, presumably in order to blame Ukraine for the attack.
The document also notes that the attack appeared to be a staged operation, likely involving the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces, the country’s Investigative Committee, the Federal Penitentiary Service (FSIN), and representatives of the so-called “Donetsk People's Republic.” The involvement of Wagner Group mercenaries as organizers is ruled out by the report. In total, at least 20 individuals may have been involved in planning and covering up the attack, including commanders of the 61st and 155th Naval Infantry Brigades and of the 11th Guards Motor Rifle Regiment.
According to investigators, before the attack, FSIN personnel urgently relocated the prisoners to Barracks 200, where the explosion later occurred. The presumed objective of the attack was to disrupt the supply of Western weapons to Ukraine and to influence the agenda of the United Nations Security Council, which was scheduled to meet the following day.
In his statement, Ukrainian Ombudsman Lubinets emphasized that the Ukrainian side had repeatedly attempted to meet with the UN mission in order to present the collected evidence, but the mission refused to take Kyiv’s findings into consideration. Meanwhile, Russia’s ombudsman declined to participate in a joint visit to the prison. Only a year later, according to Lubinets, did the UN officially acknowledge that Russia’s claim about the use of HIMARS was unfounded.
The Ukrainian ombudsman called the report an important document that should catalyze a full-fledged international investigation. He urged for the public disclosure of the findings and for bringing the culprits to justice.
The Ukrainian side continues to collect eyewitness testimonies and to analyze satellite images and photos. It has also offered a reward for information that could help in identifying the perpetrators of the attack.
On the night of July 28, 2022, the explosion at the prison claimed the lives of 53 Ukrainian prisoners of war and injured another 130.
The authorities of the so-called Donetsk “People's Republic,” along with the Russian Ministry of Defense, claimed that the strike on the prison had been carried out by the Ukrainian side using American HIMARS multiple launch rocket systems. However, CNN investigators who analyzed videos, photographs, and satellite images reported that the likelihood of a HIMARS missile strike on the prison was all but nonexistent.
From the very beginning, the Ukrainian side has insisted that the explosion in Olenivka was a terrorist act orchestrated by Russia in an effort to disrupt Western weapons supplies to Kyiv. Among those killed in the 2022 prison strike were fighters from the Azov Regiment, whom Russia was reluctant to exchange, as The Insider reported.
SEE ALSO
Kot vedno v vsaki vojni, boš našel kup ljudi, ki se ne bodo borili. Tudi v rusiji je enako. Imap na miljone rusov razesljenih po svetu, ki se nočejo boriti proti ukrajincem in ne podpirajo Putina. Imaš jih tudi na miljone, ki so se izselili iz Rusije ravno zaradi tega in nočejo nazaj v Rusijo. Imamo pa seveda tudi takšne, ki uživajo življenje na zahodu in nam tle lomijo škatle.
