Vojna v Ukrajini 2

Uporabnik mirsi je napisal:

Slovensko sodišče se ni ukvarjalo z obtoženim ampak s sodbo jugoslovanskega sodišča in sodnim postopkom. (obtoženi bi bil lahko kdorkoli) In obtoženi ni bil nikoli slovenski državljan.

Klikni za razširitev

Uporabnik damirj je napisal:

Ja no povej že enkrat za kaj se je šlo.

Klikni za razširitev

• 1921-1945: After the Russian Civil War, Crimea was part of the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic (RSFSR) but was given the status of an autonomous republic known as the Crimean Autonomous Soviet Socialist Republic (Crimean ASSR). This was primarily due to its significant Tatar population.
• 1945-1954: Following World War II, the Crimean Tatars were deported from Crimea in 1944 by Soviet authorities under accusations of collaboration with the Nazis. Consequently, the Crimean ASSR was downgraded to the status of an oblast (region) within the RSFSR in 1945, becoming the Crimean Oblast.
• 1954: In a significant administrative move, Nikita Khrushchev, then First Secretary of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, transferred the Crimean Oblast from the RSFSR to the Ukrainian Soviet Socialist Republic (Ukrainian SSR). This transfer was officially to mark the 300th anniversary of the Pereyaslav Agreement which symbolically united Ukraine with Russia.

• Ancient Times to Middle Ages: Crimea was inhabited by various groups like the Scythians, Greeks, Goths, Huns, and others. It was known as the Tauric Peninsula. Greek colonies like Chersonesos were established, and later, Byzantine influence was significant with the establishment of the Theme of Klimata.
• 13th to 15th Century: In the Middle Ages, Crimea was under the influence of the Mongol Golden Horde. Later, the Crimean Khanate emerged as an independent state in the mid-15th century, nominally under the suzerainty of the Ottoman Empire. The Crimean Khanate was a powerful entity, often involved in raids into Eastern Europe, particularly Ukraine and Russia.
• 18th Century: The Russian Empire began to exert control over Crimea. After several conflicts, particularly the Russo-Turkish Wars, Russia annexed Crimea in 1783 under Catherine the Great. This ended the independence of the Crimean Khanate.
• Late 18th to Early 20th Century: Crimea became part of the Russian Empire as the Taurida Governorate. It was a period of colonization by Russians and migration from various parts of the empire, leading to a multi-ethnic region. The Crimean Tatars, who were the indigenous Muslim population, faced various policies aimed at Russification.
• Early 20th Century: During the Russian Civil War (1917-1923), Crimea saw various powers controlling it, including the Bolsheviks, Whites, and even briefly an independent Crimean People's Republic in 1917-1918. However, by 1921, with the Bolshevik victory in the civil war, Crimea was incorporated into the Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic (RSFSR), setting the stage for its status within the Soviet Union.

Uporabnik mirsi je napisal:

Šlo se je za to, da je sodišče razveljavilo tisti Hruščovov dekret, v katerem Krim podarja Ukrajini.
Pa sedaj ne najdem več tistega linka, (si ga žal nisem shranil) v katerem je navedena številka sodbe, datum, kraj... in vse drugo

Pa vidim sedaj da je tudi brezveze da ga iščem, ker si od tvojih prvotnih trditev, kako so na sodišču vrhunski strokovnjaki in kako je sodišču za zaupat obrnil ploščo in si najprej pogojeval veljavnost sodbe z datumom, potem še s krajem, državo, pa še kaj se boš izmislil da takšna sodba po tvoje ne more veljat.

Izgovorov je pa lahko dosti, če bi bilo v SZ, bi rekel da ne velja, ker SZ ni bila demokratična in pravna država, Če kasneje v Ukrajini, bi rekel da se druga država ne more spreminjat sodb druge države, če bi bilo v Rusiji - ki je pravna naslednica SZ bi rekel da rusko sodišče ne more - ker Krim je v Ukrajini... Potem še vedno ostanejo zastaranja, sodnik neprave narodnosti, pristranski sodnik........ vstavi po želji.

Ampak če bi veljalo to, kar si trdil v začetku, o vrhunskih strokovnjakih na sodišču ki jim gre zaupati, potem je često vseeno če se je ugotovilo, da je tisti dekret neustaven, ali naslednji dan ali čez sto let in tudi ni važno kje in kdo je to ugotovil. Če se je ugotovilo, da je dekret protiustaven, potem je vseeno kdo kje in kdaj je to ugotovil. In vzpostavit prejšnje stanje.

Klikni za razširitev