Covid-19 Covid-19 in teorije zarot

Matey

AlterZavarovalničar
6. sep 2007
32.528
14.131
113
super video. glavni akter pa Troha.
model ima v roki znanstveni dokaz od Slo zdravnika, kateri je napisal, da virus ne obstaja. v eno trdijo, da ne obstaja virus sars, ptičja gripa, svinjska gripa...
nekako takole:
voznik avtobusa lpp, kateri vozi avtobus že 35 let, na papir napiše, da avtobus ne obstaja. tale papir potem dobijo v roke modeli, z njim pred rtv, in javno trdijo, da
avtobus ne obstaja, ker imajo znanstveni dokaz o neobstoji avtobusa.
in iz tega dokumenta nastane gibanje antiavtobus.
in taki imajo volilno pravico.
Ne pozabi na to, da je ta SLO zdravnik (ko je izvedel kaj Troha razlaga in kaže naokoli) zanikal, da bi kadarkoli kaj takšnega izjavil.

Edit - nisem videl tvojega naslednjega posta ;)
 

Ytbnd

Guru
2. mar 2010
16.147
5.568
113
Greta nas bo rešila, skupaj s Klausom
E-W5KZKWYAUqKb5.jpg
 

Ytbnd

Guru
2. mar 2010
16.147
5.568
113
Samo datum v članku je potrebno spremeniti
 

Hanzi

Guru
27. jul 2007
46.148
5.753
113
pri taščici
Se pravi lahko recemo da je Covid krizo izumil clovek. Namenoma ali nenamenona zdaj se niti ne vemo. Ne bi bilo pa nic cudnega ce bi nekoc nekje se nekdo pokesal pa navrgel dokaze da je bilo to zrežirano.
Razloge seveda lahko ugibano zaenkrat.
 

Ytbnd

Guru
2. mar 2010
16.147
5.568
113
1+1= 3 pravi mosseero

Preko Freedom of Information Act je the
Intercept prišel do teh podatkov.
Kaj vam ni jasno ?


Dva dneva nazaj objavil


Novo
 
Nazadnje urejeno:
  • Všeč mi je
Reactions: AndY1

AndY1

Guru
Osebje foruma
18. sep 2007
22.031
4.047
113
 

damirj

Guru
9. maj 2012
4.769
2.022
113
Smeha polna skleda ob branju užaljenosti nekoga, ker ku na Wikipediji niso objavili članka o učinkovitosti ivermektina. Kar je odlična novica in potrditev, da je Wikipedija enako zanesljiv vir informacij kot najbolj znane pisne enciklopedije, npr Enciklopedija britanica ipd.
 
  • Všeč mi je
Reactions: jest5

AndY1

Guru
Osebje foruma
18. sep 2007
22.031
4.047
113
Smeha polna skleda ob branju užaljenosti nekoga, ker ku na Wikipediji niso objavili članka o učinkovitosti ivermektina. Kar je odlična novica in potrditev, da je Wikipedija enako zanesljiv vir informacij kot najbolj znane pisne enciklopedije, npr Enciklopedija britanica ipd.
O ja, seveda:

In support, Wikipedia cites an AP Fact Check article by a journalist, Ms. Beatrice Dupuy, who is not a medical professional to my knowledge. She has never served as a medical director of Critical Care or Pulmonary Medicine. I believe she has written for StarTribune and TeenVogue Magazine in the past.
What is truly troubling is that the Wikipedia editor considers this type of “fact check” by a non-physician a reliable source. What is even more troubling is that Wikipedia DOES NOT CONSIDER the American Journal of Therapeutics a reliable source. Their editors REFUSED to allow even the mention of Dr. Kory's recent publication or Dr. Tess Lawrie's recent publication in the same journal.
I received ASOP’s explanation, attached to my reversion, that the American Journal of Therapeutics was considered NOT RELIABLE, and he considered this medical journal a FRINGE source.
I was curious. I checked his other editing activity, which is displayed on Wikipedia.

It turns out that he is also the same editor who manages the Oxford-AstraZeneca COVID-19 Vaccine Wiki page, and he is also the very same British retired computer scientist who edits the Big Pharma conspiracy theory Wiki page. He also edits the Spike Protein Wiki page.
He is curiously aligned with Big Pharma, Big Vaccines, and Big Regulators in all of his viewpoints. To those who challenge him, he frequently threatens “sanctions” and barring from Wikipedia. One might think this fabled super-editor at Wikipedia, ASOP, has medical training or a degree in the life sciences. But no, he is skilled at computer code, and he, like many political pundits, is a skilled debater and wordsmith, but he has precious few skills when it comes to medicine.

Funny that this non-physician would be “the chosen one” to edit Wiki pages on vaccines, spike protein, and Ivermectin, out of the 41 million other potential editors, but perhaps there is a lot at stake here. For whom? And to undo an edit within 5 minutes on July 4th suggests an early warning monitoring system of nuclear proportions.
Another editor called ASOP out on his obvious conflict of interest. Let’s call this second editor, SENSE, who wrote,

“This article is absolutely disgusting. If you google "Big Pharma", this is the first result that comes up. It's as if all use of "Big Pharma" is somehow suggestive of a conspiracy regarding, of course, a very noble and honorable industry.” SENSE continued,

“Your history in this talk page strongly suggests that you might have a WP: COI (Wikipedia Conflict of Interest) regarding your connections to the medical industry.”
 

damirj

Guru
9. maj 2012
4.769
2.022
113
Saj veš, da to pišeš zato, ker dvomiš v verodostojnost podatkov? Hkrati seveda nimaš neke pametne alternative in vse kar zmoreš je linkanje do precej dvomljivih sursov informacij. To je precej zaksrbljujoče.