Covid-19 Ivermectin

AndY1

Guru
Osebje foruma
18. sep 2007
22.031
4.047
113

Table 2e. Characteristics of Antiviral Agents That Are Approved or Under Evaluation for the Treatment of COVID-19​

Last Updated: July 08, 2021
Ivermectin
Adults:
  • The dose most commonly used in clinical trials is IVM 0.2–0.6 mg/kg PO given as a single dose or as a once-daily dose for up to 5 days.
 

kajpace

Guru
6. nov 2018
5.151
3.164
113
- za tvojim hrbtom...
hmpg.net
Še žal mi bo, da sem to napisal, ker se boste "vsuli" po meni...

Moje mjenje:
- AndY1 ima pač svoje mnenje
- drugi ima(te)mo drugo mnenje
- to ni razlog za sovraštvo, dajanje nekoga v nič, prepire itd...
- Ali bi lahko Alter bil "pameten"?
 

mosseero

fizik´alc
3. sep 2007
19.218
9.455
113
kod Džej-Zija
Sorry, teorije zarote in lepljenje oslarij iz znanih antivaxx siteov ni drugo mnenje. Razen če je zate drugo mnenje, da ko dobiš diagnozo raka, greš še Maručo ali Karin povprašat po napovedi.

Kako "drugo mnenje" pogubno vpliva, sta imela za izkusiti vsaj Steve Jobs in Janez Drnovšek. Zato je nedopustno, da se zganja taka neokusna anticepilska propaganda, zmot in odgovornosti pa nihče ne nosi.
 
  • Všeč mi je
  • Haha
Reactions: sad in SamSvoj

kajpace

Guru
6. nov 2018
5.151
3.164
113
- za tvojim hrbtom...
hmpg.net
Sorry, teorije zarote in lepljenje oslarij iz znanih antivaxx siteov ni drugo mnenje. Razen če je zate drugo mnenje, da ko dobiš diagnozo raka, greš še Maručo ali Karin povprašat po napovedi.

Kako "drugo mnenje" pogubno vpliva, sta imela za izkusiti vsaj Steve Jobs in Janez Drnovšek. Zato je nedopustno, da se zganja taka neokusna anticepilska propaganda, zmot in odgovornosti pa nihče ne nosi.
Se ne strinjam, žal mi je, oprosti...
Vsak ima lahko drugo mnenje - če pa to mnenje škodi njemu ali ostalim, ki so ga preizkusili, so si pa sami krivi...
 
  • Všeč mi je
Reactions: SamSvoj

mosseero

fizik´alc
3. sep 2007
19.218
9.455
113
kod Džej-Zija
Se ne strinjam, žal mi je, oprosti...
Vsak ima lahko drugo mnenje - če pa to mnenje škodi njemu ali ostalim, ki so ga preizkusili, so si pa sami krivi...
Zanj kot moderatorja bi morali veljati višji standardi. Ker ima več vpliva in ker z lahkoto vodi lastno agendo. Tako nikoli ne bana ljudi na svoji strani, samo na nasprotni. Naj vrne moderatorstvo in kot običajen uporabnik fura svojo linijo. Toliko jajc pa nima.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: SamSvoj

AndY1

Guru
Osebje foruma
18. sep 2007
22.031
4.047
113
Banam ljudi, ki hudo žalijo. Pa še to zelo zelo redko.
Če jih pa ne jaz, jih pa Kameleon.

Sicer pa to ni debata te teme.
 
  • Všeč mi je
Reactions: SamSvoj

kajpace

Guru
6. nov 2018
5.151
3.164
113
- za tvojim hrbtom...
hmpg.net
Zanj kot moderatorja bi morali veljati višji standardi. Ker ima več vpliva in ker z lahkoto vodi lastno agendo. Tako nikoli ne bana ljudi na svoji strani, samo na nasprotni. Naj vrne moderatorstvo in kot običajen uporabnik fura svojo linijo. Toliko jajc pa nima.
Kar se tiče bananja, ne vem...
To, da je moderator, pa ne pomeni, da ne sme imeti svojega mišljenja... Saj ga ne vsiljuje, samo napiše/prilepi ga... Če se ne strinjaš, pač napišeš, ampak brez zmerjanja...
To se mi zdi enako kot levi-desni-beli-rdeči...
Dajte no mir s takimi...
 
  • Všeč mi je
Reactions: SamSvoj in jendomen

Janez40

Guru
12. jul 2016
3.403
4.502
113
Kar se tiče bananja, ne vem...
To, da je moderator, pa ne pomeni, da ne sme imeti svojega mišljenja... Saj ga ne vsiljuje, samo napiše/prilepi ga... Če se ne strinjaš, pač napišeš, ampak brez zmerjanja...
To se mi zdi enako kot levi-desni-beli-rdeči...
Dajte no mir s takimi...
Razlika je med napisati mnenje ali dnevno spamati desetine postov iz antivax lažnivih strani kar g. moderator počne z velikim zanosom. In realno si tudi zasluži marsikatero žaljivko zaradi katere potem besno bena, ker drugega ne zna.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: SamSvoj

mosseero

fizik´alc
3. sep 2007
19.218
9.455
113
kod Džej-Zija

jest5

Guru
18. avg 2007
25.165
-8.273
113
Pa še pocitiram, da se ne spregleda

Repurposing drugs for COVID-19​


Not every attempt at repurposing a drug works as hoped, however.


At the start of the pandemic, scientists and doctors tried to find inexpensive medications to repurpose for the treatment and prevention of COVID-19. Chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine were two of those drugs. They were chosen because of possible antiviral effects documented in laboratory studies and limited anecdotal case reports from the first COVID-19 outbreaks in China. However, large clinical studies of these drugs to treat COVID-19 did not translate to any meaningful benefits. This was partly due to the serious toxic effects patients experienced before the drugs reached a high enough dose to inhibit or kill the virus.


Unfortunately, lessons from these failed attempts have not been applied to ivermectin. The false hope around using ivermectin to treat COVID-19 originated from an April 2020 laboratory study in Australia. Although the results from this study were widely circulated, I immediately had serious doubts. The concentration of ivermectin they tested was 20 to 2,000 times higher than the standard dosages used to treat human parasitic infections. Indeed, many other pharmaceutical experts confirmed my initial concerns within a month of the paper’s publication. Such high concentrations of the drug could be significantly toxic.


Another commonly cited paper on ivermectin’s purported effects against COVID-19 was withdrawn in July 2021 after scientists found serious flaws with the study. These flaws ranged from incorrect statistical analyses to discrepancies between collected data and published results to duplicated patient records and the inclusion of study subjects who died before even entering the study. Even more concerning, at least two other oft-cited studies have raised significant concerns about scientific fraud.


At the time of this writing, two large randomized clinical trials both showed no significant benefit from the use of ivermectin for COVID-19. Reputable national and international health care organizations, including the World Health Organization, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the National Institutes of Health, the Food and Drug Administration and the Infectious Diseases Society of America, unanimously recommend against the use of ivermectin to prevent or treat COVID-19 unless in the context of a clinical trial.


Consequences of using ivermectin for COVID-19​


Unfortunately, many organizations with dubious intentions have continued to promote unsubstantiated use of invermectin for COVID-19. This has led to a dramatic rise in ivermectin prescriptions and a flood of calls to U.S. poison control centers for ivermectin overdoses. Many calls were due to ingestion of large amounts of veterinary products containing ivermectin – two deaths linked to ivermectin overdose were reported in September 2021.


Ivermectin, when used correctly, has prevented millions of potentially fatal and debilitating infectious diseases. It’s meant to be prescribed only to treat infections caused by parasites. It’s not meant to be prescribed by parasites looking to extract money from desperate people during a pandemic. It’s my sincere hope that this unfortunate and tragic chapter in the otherwise incredible story of a lifesaving medication will come to a quick end.


Written by Jeffrey R. Aeschlimann, Associate Professor of Pharmacy, University of Connecticut.
 

AndY1

Guru
Osebje foruma
18. sep 2007
22.031
4.047
113

Case closed!

Javi to še na NIH:

Zanimivo, da je doziranje enako kot ga ima FLCCC protokol.
 

sad

Guru
24. avg 2007
20.461
9.154
113
Kaj zdej. Kam naj grem po konjsko pasto? Smo sedaj že ugotovili, da deluje ali ne?
1 leto od odprtja teme bi se lahko že skristalizirala zadeva.
Sem vedel, da bo konj prišel enkrat prav. Kaj pa naj veterinarju rečem, kake probleme ima, da dobim to pasto?
PS: za dober denar jo delim. Več pa na PM.
 

AndY1

Guru
Osebje foruma
18. sep 2007
22.031
4.047
113
Ni samo v obliki konjske paste. Je tudi v obliki tekocine. 1ml = 10mg Ivermectina.